Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 06:54:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 06:54:00 -0400 Received: from mail.teraport.de ([195.143.8.72]:60032 "EHLO mail.teraport.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 06:53:50 -0400 Message-ID: <3B5C023D.2E0D3B04@TeraPort.de> Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 12:53:49 +0200 From: Martin Knoblauch Organization: TeraPort GmbH X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.7 i686) X-Accept-Language: en, de MIME-Version: 1.0 To: reiser@namesys.com CC: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Experimental status of ReiserFS [was: Re: OT: Journaling FS Comparison] X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on lotus/Teraport/de(Release 5.0.7 |March 21, 2001) at 07/23/2001 12:53:35 PM, Serialize by Router on lotus/Teraport/de(Release 5.0.7 |March 21, 2001) at 07/23/2001 12:53:42 PM, Serialize complete at 07/23/2001 12:53:42 PM Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing Hi, setting aside my personal preferences (used to work for SGI :-), ReiserFS seems "to have won" the race for being first journaling FS in the kernel. To me it seems pretty stable and well performing. My question is: what keeps it in the "experimental" state? Thanks Martin -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Martin Knoblauch | email: Martin.Knoblauch@TeraPort.de TeraPort GmbH | Phone: +49-89-510857-309 C+ITS | Fax: +49-89-510857-111 http://www.teraport.de | Mobile: +49-170-4904759 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/