Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261197AbVELHpK (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 May 2005 03:45:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261219AbVELHpK (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 May 2005 03:45:10 -0400 Received: from pop.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:12248 "HELO mail.gmx.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S261197AbVELHpA (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 May 2005 03:45:00 -0400 Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 09:44:59 +0200 (MEST) From: "Manfred Schwarb" To: Willy Tarreau Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20050511231016.GC18600@alpha.home.local> Subject: Re: 2.4.30-hf1 do_IRQ stack overflows X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Authenticated: #17170890 Message-ID: <16624.1115883899@www69.gmx.net> X-Mailer: WWW-Mail 1.6 (Global Message Exchange) X-Flags: 0001 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1967 Lines: 53 > > > > Hi, > > with recent versions of the 2.4 kernel (Vanilla), I get an increasing > > amount of do_IRQ stack overflows. > > This night, I got 3 of them. > > With 2.4.28 I got an overflow about twice a year, with 2.4.29 nearly > > once a month and with 2.4.30 nearly every day 8-(( > > stupid question : have you tried reverting to older versions to check > if the problem follows kernel upgrades or if something is ageing badly > in your machine ? > No, I have not, and I think I will not find the needed time to fully track it down. > > My layout: Pentium4 HT SMP, raid1 on a promise card, driven by > > libata_promise, everything using reiserfs, heavy nfs and network > traffic, > > with a Linksys (tulip) and a Realtek (8139too) NIC. > > do you mean that you tested both with tulip and realtek and that the > problem happens with both of them, or that your machine needs those > two NICs simultaneously ? Using a realtek with heavy NFS and network > traffic seems somewhat odd, eventhough the driver is rather stable. > both simultaneously. I thought the realtek is enough for the internet connection, as the bottleneck clearly is the ISP (we have a 10Mb/s wire). "heavy" is relative, a few handful (<20) of concurrent connections. the other NIC is the connection to the internal network. > > The used 2.4.30-hf1 is pure Vanilla. > > > > Below my three overflow messages. Would the stack reduction patches of > > Badari Pulavarty help in my case? > > I don't know. I suspect that it might delay the problem but not remove > it. > > Regards, > Willy > Thanks, Manfred -- +++ Neu: Echte DSL-Flatrates von GMX - Surfen ohne Limits +++ Always online ab 4,99 Euro/Monat: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/