Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261787AbVELMsd (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 May 2005 08:48:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261807AbVELMsc (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 May 2005 08:48:32 -0400 Received: from public.id2-vpn.continvity.gns.novell.com ([195.33.99.129]:14905 "EHLO emea1-mh.id2.novell.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261787AbVELMs3 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 May 2005 08:48:29 -0400 Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 6.5.4 Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 14:48:26 +0200 From: "Jan Beulich" To: Cc: , , Subject: Re: [PATCH] adjust x86-64 watchdog tick calculation Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1091 Lines: 19 >>> Alexander Nyberg 12.05.05 12:00:08 >>> >tor 2005-05-12 klockan 10:27 +0200 skrev Jan Beulich: >> Get the x86-64 watchdog tick calculation into a state where it can also >> be used with nmi_hz other than 1Hz. Also do not turn on the watchdog by >> default (as is already done on i386). > >Why shouldn't the watchdog be turned on by default? It's an extremely >useful debugging aid and it's not like it fires NMIs often (the nmi_hz >is far from reality). For the so-called LAPIC one (based on performance monitor counters) that's true; that is for AMD boxes. For Intel boxes, which get defaulted to the IOAPIC version, it runs at HZ, and this is in my opinion significant overhead. If the Intel support for LAPIC watchdog was completed, and that used as the default, I would certainly agree to keeping it on by default. Jan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/