Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262540AbVEMUgS (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 May 2005 16:36:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262538AbVEMUfa (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 May 2005 16:35:30 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:13734 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262540AbVEMU3X (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 May 2005 16:29:23 -0400 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Andres Salomon Subject: Re: Status of net/ipv4/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_icmp.c? Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 15:09:01 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20050513041622.GE3603@stusta.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.150.84.1 User-Agent: Pan/0.14.2.91 (As She Crawled Across the Table (Debian GNU/Linux)) Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 770 Lines: 28 On Fri, 13 May 2005 06:16:22 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Hi, > > can anyone explain the status of? > > This file is always included in the kernel if CONFIG_IP_VS=y, but it's > completely unused. > > Will it be made working in the forseeable future or is it a candidate > for removal? > > TIA > Adrian The people/places to ask would probably be: IPVS P: Wensong Zhang M: wensong@linux-vs.org P: Julian Anastasov M: ja@ssi.bg S: Maintained or http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/mailing.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/