Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 17:52:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 17:52:12 -0400 Received: from perninha.conectiva.com.br ([200.250.58.156]:12305 "HELO perninha.conectiva.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 17:51:38 -0400 Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 18:51:36 -0300 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: To: Larry McVoy Cc: Jerome de Vivie , , , , Subject: Re: Yet another linux filesytem: with version control In-Reply-To: <20010723141751.W6820@work.bitmover.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing On Mon, 23 Jul 2001, Larry McVoy wrote: > b) Filesystem support for SCM is really a flawed approach. Agreed. I mean, how can you cleanly group changesets and versions with a filesystem level "transparent" SCM ? The goal of an SCM is to _manage_ versions and changesets, if it doesn't do that we're back at CVS's "every file its own versioning and to hell with manageability" ... regards, Rik -- Executive summary of a recent Microsoft press release: "we are concerned about the GNU General Public License (GPL)" http://www.surriel.com/ http://www.conectiva.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/