Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 08:09:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 08:09:26 -0400 Received: from sundiver.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE ([134.93.174.136]:23791 "HELO duron.intern.kubla.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 08:09:19 -0400 Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 14:09:16 +0200 From: Dominik Kubla To: Paul Jakma Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Arp problem Message-ID: <20010724140916.F31198@intern.kubla.de> In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i X-No-Archive: yes Restrict: no-external-archive Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 02:10:33AM +0100, Paul Jakma wrote: > if i have 2 logical subnets on the wire, linux listening on both, is > there any way to get linux to fully route packets between the 2 > subnets? > > at the moment it just issues a icmp_redirect, which isn't good enough > for certain hosts (eg win9x at least). Solaris 8 ditto. IMHO this is definitely a linux bug, since the kernel can not now about the true network topology: Cable sharing might just be used for this one system doing the routing/filtering/whatever between the two networks, while all the other hosts are in seperated switch segments. Not a common setup but you will see this often enough: head count is already 2... ;-) Dominik -- A lovely thing to see: Kobayashi Issa through the paper window's holes (1763-1828) the galaxy. [taken from: David Brin - Sundiver] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/