Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261748AbVERAIu (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 May 2005 20:08:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262034AbVERAIt (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 May 2005 20:08:49 -0400 Received: from graphe.net ([209.204.138.32]:51207 "EHLO graphe.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261748AbVERAI2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 May 2005 20:08:28 -0400 Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 17:08:19 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter X-X-Sender: christoph@graphe.net To: Matthew Dobson cc: "Martin J. Bligh" , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel Subject: Re: 2.6.12-rc4-mm2 build failure In-Reply-To: <428A8697.4010606@us.ibm.com> Message-ID: References: <734820000.1116277209@flay> <428A8697.4010606@us.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Score: -5.9 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 703 Lines: 15 On Tue, 17 May 2005, Matthew Dobson wrote: > Not a big fan of this patch. It's not wrong, per-se, but it just doesn't > sit right with me. asm-generic/topology.h should be a fallback file for > the arches that just want some sort of sane UP/SMP defaults. The better > (IMHO) solution is this patch. Builds fine on PPC64. And what happens if yet another function needs to be added for all arches? Then ppc64 will break again and you will fix it again? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/