Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 11:06:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 11:06:36 -0400 Received: from haybaler.sackheads.org ([209.133.38.16]:51978 "HELO haybaler.sackheads.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 11:06:30 -0400 Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 11:06:35 -0400 From: Jimmie Mayfield To: Mike Black Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Interesting disk throughput performance problem Message-ID: <20010724110635.A28268@sackheads.org> In-Reply-To: <20010721233313.A15232@sackheads.org> <016201c1129b$4e459b60$b6562341@cfl.rr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <016201c1129b$4e459b60$b6562341@cfl.rr.com>; from mblack@csihq.com on Sun, Jul 22, 2001 at 06:44:38AM -0400 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing On Sun, Jul 22, 2001 at 06:44:38AM -0400, Mike Black wrote: > Not enough info (plenty for guessing though :-) > > First off show "hdparm -i /dev/hd_" and "hdparm /dev/hd_" -- this will > ensure both drives have things like DMA, etc. > Next -- you didn't say what benchmarks you're using locally. > And as the previous poster said provide "cat /proc/interrupts". /proc/interrupts looks like this: CPU0 0: 17319250 XT-PIC timer 1: 85980 XT-PIC keyboard 2: 0 XT-PIC cascade 5: 1084144 XT-PIC ide3, usb-uhci, usb-uhci 6: 811 XT-PIC floppy 9: 1284463 XT-PIC mga@PCI:1:0:0 10: 142416 XT-PIC eth0 11: 8296678 XT-PIC eth1, C-Media PCI CM8738 12: 385915 XT-PIC PS/2 Mouse 15: 7 XT-PIC ide1 NMI: 0 LOC: 17319087 ERR: 3022 MIS: 0 I would like to make a correction to my original post. In that post I said that the drives are "masters" on their own controller. This was false. They share a controller (CMD 649) with the Maxtor drive being "master" and the IBM drive being "slave". To test if this was the problem, I reran the tests (see URL below) with the IBM drive completely disconnected. I didn't notice any difference. I collected my benchmarks and tests into a simple webpage to avoid cluttering this list. Hopefully someone will see something obvious that I've misconfigured. http://sackheads.org/~mayfield/dp.html Jimmie -- Jimmie Mayfield http://www.sackheads.org/mayfield email: mayfield+usenet@sackheads.org My mail provider does not welcome UCE -- http://www.sackheads.org/uce - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/