Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 11:47:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 11:47:00 -0400 Received: from leibniz.math.psu.edu ([146.186.130.2]:51963 "EHLO math.psu.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 11:46:56 -0400 Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 11:46:40 -0400 (EDT) From: Alexander Viro To: Davide Libenzi cc: Jonathan Lundell , Jan Hubicka , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net, Jeff Dike , Andrea Arcangeli , Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: user-mode port 0.44-2.4.7 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Davide Libenzi wrote: > One more thing, with volatile you specify it one time ( declaration time ), > while with barrier() you've to spread inside the code tons of such macro > everywhere you touch the variable. That's the whole point, damnit. Syntax (or semantics) sugar is a Bad Thing(tm). If your algorithm depends on something in a nontrivial way - _spell_ _it_ _out_. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/