Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 12:09:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 12:08:50 -0400 Received: from leibniz.math.psu.edu ([146.186.130.2]:42902 "EHLO math.psu.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 12:08:44 -0400 Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 12:08:40 -0400 (EDT) From: Alexander Viro To: Davide Libenzi cc: Linus Torvalds , Andrea Arcangeli , Jeff Dike , user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jan Hubicka , Jonathan Lundell Subject: Re: user-mode port 0.44-2.4.7 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Davide Libenzi wrote: > I would not call, to pretend the compiler to issue memory loads every time it access > a variable, a nontrivial way. > It sounds pretty clear to me. You know, one of the nice things about C is that unless you abuse preprocessor, reading code doesn't require doing far lookups. Most of it can be read and understood with very little context. "Do it once when you declare a variable" goes against that and that's not a good thing. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/