Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 13:01:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 13:01:22 -0400 Received: from router-100M.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.17]:27401 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 13:01:17 -0400 Subject: Re: Arp problem To: kubla@sciobyte.de (Dominik Kubla) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 17:34:33 +0100 (BST) Cc: paul@clubi.ie (Paul Jakma), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20010724140916.F31198@intern.kubla.de> from "Dominik Kubla" at Jul 24, 2001 02:09:16 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL5] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing > IMHO this is definitely a linux bug, since the kernel can not now about > the true network topology: Cable sharing might just be used for this one > system doing the routing/filtering/whatever between the two networks, > while all the other hosts are in seperated switch segments. Not a common > setup but you will see this often enough: head count is already 2... ;-) The default Linux, Solaris setup is the standard. Take it up with the IETF if you don't like it. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/