DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=aK+gNXdh1Gz8mAPBsr7MFLNy1o7Cw19I+n1No1+xjGxkePuyM6ag/kHWUoV9mqg9sLqkozEplkZx7cmDRj07OJGFSmh2yEPGyAOBCXlV8Fnm+ZB7R7rKbmGx5HS4SDyRVJ5FK9jhfVTnDMVCU27hHPEeEtC2A9MpwwsKXdtKKcs=
Message-ID: <377362e105051902467cae323e@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 18:46:27 +0900
From: "Tetsuji \"Maverick\" Rai" <tetsuji.rai@gmail.com>
Reply-To: "Tetsuji \"Maverick\" Rai" <tetsuji.rai@gmail.com>
To: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
Subject: Re: HT scheduler: is it really correct? or is it feature of HT?
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <200505191718.55615.kernel@kolivas.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <377362e10505181142252ec930@mail.gmail.com>
	 <200505190756.16413.kernel@kolivas.org>
	 <377362e1050518235812f1cbbb@mail.gmail.com>
	 <200505191718.55615.kernel@kolivas.org>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 2466
Lines: 53

But I would like a kernel to let boinc (the "nice=19" processes) fill
the idle time as much as possible.  The current kernel scheduler seems
very sensitive to low-nice (higher priority) processes.

How can I change this sensitivity?   I'm looking at kernel/sched.c,
but it's more complicated than a few years ago when I hacked this
before :) and that I'm using HT (SMP)..  Will you tell me any hint
where to modify, and/or what to take care of?  or any pointer to
proper resources on the Internet?

When I use gnome desktop with a system monitor applet, I see there's
always some idle part and top also shows the idle time on gnome even
if I don't run any specific applications besides system daemons and
gnome background processes.  However without gnome/X window, top shows
no or very small idle power (as a matter of course.)  So I want the
kernel to be less sensitive.  Maybe it will utilize more cpu power.

best regards,

On 5/19/05, Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 19 May 2005 04:58 pm, Tetsuji "Maverick" Rai wrote:
> > On 5/19/05, Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org> wrote:
> > > ------------snip---------------
> > > Hyperthread sibling cpus share cpu power. If you let a nice 19 task run
> > > full power on the sibling cpu of a nice 0 task it will drain performance
> > > from the nice 0 task and make it run approximately 40% slower. The only
> > > way around this is to temporarily make the sibling run idle so that a
> > > nice 0 task gets the appropriate proportion of cpu resources compared to
> > > a nice 19 task. It is intentional and quite unique to the linux cpu
> > > scheduler as far as I can tell. On any other scheduler or OS a nice 19
> > > "background" task will make your machine run much slower.
> > >
> > Thanks.   I understood it's a feature of linux kernel and am satisfied
> > with it.  Actually on Windows xp my application sometimes slows down
> > maybe due to inpropoer scheduler.
> 
> Well I invented it so it's very unlikely that Windows* will have it (?yet) :D
> 
> Cheers,
> Con
> 


-- 
Luckiest in the world / Weapon of Mass Distraction
http://maverick6664.bravehost.com/
Aviation Jokes: http://www.geocities.com/tetsuji_rai/
Background: http://maverick.ns1.name/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/