Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261457AbVETN7A (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 May 2005 09:59:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261470AbVETN7A (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 May 2005 09:59:00 -0400 Received: from fmr22.intel.com ([143.183.121.14]:52450 "EHLO scsfmr002.sc.intel.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261457AbVETNqF (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 May 2005 09:46:05 -0400 Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 06:45:32 -0700 From: Ashok Raj To: Natalie.Protasevich@unisys.com Cc: akpm@osdl.org, ak@suse.de, zwane@arm.linux.org.uk, "Brown, Len" , bjorn.helgaas@hp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch 1/1] Proposed: Let's not waste precious IRQs... Message-ID: <20050520064531.A14497@unix-os.sc.intel.com> References: <20050519110613.B817D27266@linux.site> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20050519110613.B817D27266@linux.site>; from Natalie.Protasevich@unisys.com on Thu, May 19, 2005 at 04:06:13AM -0700 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1557 Lines: 31 Hi Natalie, have you taken a look a the Vector Sharing Patch posted by Kaneshige for IA64? Cheers, ashok On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 04:06:13AM -0700, Natalie.Protasevich@unisys.com wrote: > > I suggest to change the way IRQs are handed out to PCI devices. > Currently, each I/O APIC pin gets associated with an IRQ, no matter if > the pin is used or not. It is expected that each pin can potentually > be engaged by a device inserted into the corresponding PCI slot. > However, this imposes severe limitation on systems that have designs > that employ many I/O APICs, only utilizing couple lines of each, such > as P64H2 chipset. It is used in ES7000, and currently, there is no way > to boot the system with more that 9 I/O APICs. The simple change below > allows to boot a system with say 64 (or more) I/O APICs, each > providing 1 slot, which otherwise impossible because of the IRQ gaps > created for unused lines on each I/O APIC. It does not resolve the > problem with number of devices that exceeds number of possible IRQs, > but eases up a tension for IRQs on any large system with potentually > large number of devices. I only implemented this for the ACPI boot, > since if the system is this big and >.. deleted... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/