From: "Miquel van Smoorenburg" <miquels@cistron.nl>
Subject: Re: Thread and process dentifiers (CPU affinity, kill)
Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 18:13:48 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Cistron
Message-ID: <d6l9cs$l1t$1@news.cistron.nl>
References: <428CD458.6010203@free.fr> <20050520125511.GC23488@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> <428DF95E.2070703@free.fr> <20050520165307.GG23488@csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Originator: mikevs@cistron.nl (Miquel van Smoorenburg)
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1185
Lines: 21

In article <20050520165307.GG23488@csclub.uwaterloo.ca>,
Lennart Sorensen <lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
>On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 04:51:10PM +0200, Olivier Croquette wrote:
>> From the beginning we are talking about the present GNU/Linux systems, 
>> which do already use NTPL in standard. NPTL is no future standard, it is 
>> present standard.
>
>Hmm, I just noticed the page I found about NPTL had 2005 date one place
>and 2002 in another.  Yeah that is what people are using already.
>
>Most current i386 systems do NOT use NPTL yet by default since it only
>works on 2.6 kernels, and even then probably only if glibc was compiled
>that way.

No. On modern systems, glibc contains both LinuxThreads and NPTL.
They have the same ABI. At runtime one of the two is selected,
depending on if the currently running kernel supports NTPL.
You can also force it by setting the LD_ASSUME_KERNEL environment
variable to 2.4 or 2.6.

Mike.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/