Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261413AbVEUNeq (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 May 2005 09:34:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261356AbVEUNeq (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 May 2005 09:34:46 -0400 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([212.18.232.186]:65042 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261420AbVEUNed (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 May 2005 09:34:33 -0400 Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 14:34:28 +0100 From: Russell King To: Linux Kernel List , Linus Torvalds Subject: latest sparse warnings with latest kernel Message-ID: <20050521143428.A25980@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Linux Kernel List , Linus Torvalds Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 873 Lines: 23 Hi, I'm seeing a lot of the following warnings when building the latest -git kernel with the latest sparse checker: /usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/arm-linux/3.3/include/stdarg.h:54:9: warning: preprocessor token va_copy redefined /home/rmk/git/linux-2.6-rmk/include/linux/compiler-gcc2.h:29:9: this was the original definition Since sparse pretends to be a gcc 2.95 compiler, should it really be using the gcc 3.3 header files? Shouldn't it provide its own headers to correspond with the version it pretends to be? 8) -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/