Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261230AbVEVKwQ (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 May 2005 06:52:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261782AbVEVKwQ (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 May 2005 06:52:16 -0400 Received: from host62-24-231-113.dsl.vispa.com ([62.24.231.113]:15338 "EHLO cenedra.walrond.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261230AbVEVKwF (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 May 2005 06:52:05 -0400 From: Andrew Walrond To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] binutils-2.16 & kernel-2.6.11.10 Date: Sun, 22 May 2005 11:51:46 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <200505212259.j4LMxqAS017253@wildsau.enemy.org> In-Reply-To: <200505212259.j4LMxqAS017253@wildsau.enemy.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200505221151.46592.andrew@walrond.org> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 861 Lines: 24 On Saturday 21 May 2005 23:59, Herbert Rosmanith wrote: > > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/devel/binutils/linux-2.6-seg-5.patch > > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/devel/binutils/linux-2.4-seg-4.patch > > > > should probably fix that. > > interesting, that's the same patch (s/movl/movw/), but it is date > from *march* 2005. > > why is this not in the kernel source yet? It is definitely not > okay to "movl" a segreg. > I'd also like to know the status of these patches; I've avoided the last couple binutils upgrades because of HJL's attached kernel patches and implied Linux build problems. # Andrew Walrond - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/