Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261792AbVEVMPj (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 May 2005 08:15:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261795AbVEVMPj (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 May 2005 08:15:39 -0400 Received: from rproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.170.207]:24452 "EHLO rproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261794AbVEVMPd convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 May 2005 08:15:33 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=YC61w0ap/WAA6QUnMnuh25yYulTM6BeSPZlAVzUYpcw6lmwvcdaZ9XX8huPDZyaegJ9/j41JGhL4DJ1rFRa2zG4qpzMAkk8kEm9sXFSs8DSCglZlLrLkThg7P1I2EQnt9J3N6Id0X5MIlvv0nOq11sWHxnk2nD4bzWJJKtxOLcw= Message-ID: <25381867050522051524ea93ec@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 22 May 2005 08:15:33 -0400 From: Yani Ioannou Reply-To: Yani Ioannou To: Dmitry Torokhov Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH 2.6.12-rc4 15/15] drivers/i2c/chips/adm1026.c: use dynamic sysfs callbacks Cc: Jean Delvare , Greg KH , LKML , LM Sensors In-Reply-To: <200505220204.52907.dtor_core@ameritech.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <20050519213551.GA806@kroah.com> <200505212058.14851.dtor_core@ameritech.net> <20050522085026.40e73d49.khali@linux-fr.org> <200505220204.52907.dtor_core@ameritech.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1151 Lines: 26 On 5/22/05, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Sunday 22 May 2005 01:50, Jean Delvare wrote: > > Hi Dmitry, > > > > > I really think that as far as I2C subsystem goes instead of creating > > > arrays of attributes we should move in direction of drivers > > > registering individual sensor class devices. So for example it87 would > > > register 3 fans, 3 temp, sensors and 8 voltage sensors... Well lets see some code ;-), but yeah I have to agree with Jean here, I don't see a nice way to standardize this across all hwmon drivers, things just differ too much. > > First, it's a matter of hardware monitoring drivers, not i2c subsystem > > (both are tightly binded at the moment but I'd like this to change). How is that change going anyway? I could really do with something finalized, but the last I heard about it was Mark Hoffman's patch and that didn't seem to go anywhere. Yani - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/