Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261802AbVEVN0H (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 May 2005 09:26:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261209AbVEVN0H (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 May 2005 09:26:07 -0400 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:6361 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261802AbVEVNZ6 (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 May 2005 09:25:58 -0400 Subject: Re: When we detect that a 16550 was in fact part of a NatSemi SuperIO chip From: David Woodhouse To: Russell King Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , torvalds@osdl.org In-Reply-To: <20050522135943.E12146@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <200505220008.j4M08uE9025378@hera.kernel.org> <1116763033.19183.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050522135943.E12146@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 22 May 2005 14:23:23 +0100 Message-Id: <1116768204.19183.44.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.2 (2.2.2-5) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1644 Lines: 40 On Sun, 2005-05-22 at 13:59 +0100, Russell King wrote: > Until then, your opinions are only opinions and I don't have to take > any notice what so ever of you. You're right that my opinions are irrelevant. However, if you are right in thinking that you're affected by the DPA, then my request as a 'data subject' that you correct your copy of my personal information would be entirely relevant, and you would be legally obliged to obey. > It's rather a shame that you can't be patient and work this out in > a civilised manner isn't it? Russell, you took a patch which I had Cc'd to you merely as a courtesy, mangled the attribution and passed it on, despite the fact that I had previously asked you not to do so. When I asked you again not to do that, you were abusive. I'm sorry if you feel that asking Linus not to apply such things isn't civilised -- but I did ask you politely first, only to receive an abusive reply: rmk: I know your policy and that's why I sent the patch to akpm instead of to you. I Cc'd you as a courtesy. Yet you still mangled the attribution and sent my patch on. So... are you going to refrain from doing that in future, or am I going to stop Ccing you? dwmw2: oh fuck you, sorry. I'm really not in the mood for your bloody mindedness. All you needed to say was "OK, then I won't apply your patches". -- dwmw2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/