Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261606AbVEVSvd (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 May 2005 14:51:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261615AbVEVSvd (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 May 2005 14:51:33 -0400 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:32221 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261606AbVEVSvX (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 May 2005 14:51:23 -0400 Subject: Re: When we detect that a 16550 was in fact part of a NatSemi SuperIO chip From: Arjan van de Ven To: Russell King Cc: Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20050522194438.A9854@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <200505220008.j4M08uE9025378@hera.kernel.org> <1116763033.19183.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1116785646.6285.24.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <20050522194438.A9854@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 22 May 2005 20:51:17 +0200 Message-Id: <1116787877.6285.26.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4 (2.0.4-4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 3.7 (+++) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 2.63 on pentafluge.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (3.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.1 RCVD_IN_DSBL RBL: Received via a relay in list.dsbl.org [] 2.5 RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK RBL: Sent directly from dynamic IP address [80.57.133.107 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] 0.1 RCVD_IN_SORBS RBL: SORBS: sender is listed in SORBS [80.57.133.107 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1401 Lines: 33 On Sun, 2005-05-22 at 19:44 +0100, Russell King wrote: > On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 08:14:06PM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > On Sun, 2005-05-22 at 09:59 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, 22 May 2005, David Woodhouse wrote: > > > > > > > > Linus, please do not apply patches from me which have my personal > > > > information mangled or removed. > > > > > > I've asked Russell not to do it, but the fact is, he's worried about legal > > > issues, and while I've also tried to resolve those (by having the OSDL > > > lawyer try to contact some lawyers in the UK), that hasn't been clarified > > > yet. > > > > there is a potential nasty interaction with the UK moral rights thing > > where an author can demand that his authorship claim remains intact... > > so if David objects to his authorship being mangled (and partially > > removed) he may have a strong legal position to do so. > > Actually, that only depends on whether you decide that Signed-off-by: > reflects authorship. author David Woodhouse Sat, 21 May 2005 15:52:23 +0100 that looks far more like an authorship statement and is also munged. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/