Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 17:58:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 17:57:50 -0400 Received: from perninha.conectiva.com.br ([200.250.58.156]:34829 "HELO perninha.conectiva.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 17:57:45 -0400 Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 17:27:31 -0300 (BRT) From: Marcelo Tosatti To: Daniel Phillips Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rik van Riel , Ben LaHaise , Mike Galbraith Subject: Re: [RFC] Optimization for use-once pages In-Reply-To: <01072405473005.00301@starship> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Daniel Phillips wrote: > Today's patch tackles the use-once problem, that is, the problem of > how to identify and discard pages containing data likely to be used > only once in a long time, while retaining pages that are used more > often. > > I'll try to explain not only what I did, but the process I went > through to arrive at this particular approach. This requires some > background. Well, as I see the patch should remove the problem where drop_behind() deactivates pages of a readahead window even if some of those pages are not "used-once" pages, right ? I just want to make sure the performance improvements you're seeing caused by the fix of this _particular_ problem. If we knew the amount of non-used-once pages which drop_behind() is deactivating under _your_ tests, we could make absolute sure about the problem. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/