Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 18:24:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 18:23:55 -0400 Received: from perninha.conectiva.com.br ([200.250.58.156]:53520 "HELO perninha.conectiva.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 18:23:47 -0400 Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 17:53:36 -0300 (BRT) From: Marcelo Tosatti To: Rik van Riel Cc: Daniel Phillips , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ben LaHaise , Mike Galbraith Subject: Re: [RFC] Optimization for use-once pages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Rik van Riel wrote: > On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > > > > Today's patch tackles the use-once problem, that is, the problem of > > > > Well, as I see the patch should remove the problem where > > drop_behind() deactivates pages of a readahead window even if > > some of those pages are not "used-once" pages, right ? > > > > I just want to make sure the performance improvements you're > > seeing caused by the fix of this _particular_ problem. > > Fully agreed. > > Especially since it was a one-liner change from worse > performance to better performance (IIRC) it would be > nice to see exactly WHY the system behaves the way it > does. ;) Yes. Daniel's patch adds "drop behind" (that is, adding swapcache pages to the inactive dirty) behaviour to swapcache pages. This is a _new_ thing, and I would like to know how that is changing the whole VM behaviour.. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/