Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261219AbVEWLZl (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 May 2005 07:25:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261232AbVEWLZl (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 May 2005 07:25:41 -0400 Received: from wildsau.idv.uni.linz.at ([193.170.194.34]:40321 "EHLO wildsau.enemy.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261219AbVEWLZe (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 May 2005 07:25:34 -0400 From: Herbert Rosmanith Message-Id: <200505231125.j4NBPQoZ018751@wildsau.enemy.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] binutils-2.16.90.0.3: can't compile 2.4.30 In-Reply-To: <200505231113.j4NBDxLp018742@wildsau.enemy.org> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 13:25:26 +0200 (MET DST) CC: Herbert Rosmanith X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL100 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1011 Lines: 36 > bash-2.05# cat test.nasm > > bits 32 > section .text > > mov eax,ds > mov ds,eax > of course, it's still not possible to move 32 bits into a segreg, > so what? the processor will silently ignore the upper word, I guess. oops ... as doesn't complain about that either .... the error is produced when moving a segreg to a 32bit memory location, e.g.: (nasm) mov ds,long [ebx] (as) #APP movl %ds,636(%ebx) movl %gs,640(%ebx) #NO_APP neither nasm nor as do like that. I wonder which code the previous binutils produced in that case? sorry for the superfluos posting, I really should brush up on my assembly;-) the consequence still is to apply the patches to the kernel. best regards, herbert rosmanith - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/