Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 20:59:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 20:59:13 -0400 Received: from ohiper1-9.apex.net ([209.250.47.24]:7694 "EHLO hapablap.dyn.dhs.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 20:59:05 -0400 Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 19:55:49 -0500 From: Steven Walter To: "J . A . Magallon" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c update to 2.6.0 for 2.4.7 Message-ID: <20010724195549.A10410@hapablap.dyn.dhs.org> In-Reply-To: <20010725024629.E2308@werewolf.able.es> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010725024629.E2308@werewolf.able.es>; from jamagallon@able.es on Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 02:46:29AM +0200 X-Uptime: 7:46pm up 2 days, 4:13, 0 users, load average: 1.04, 1.02, 0.93 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 02:46:29AM +0200, J . A . Magallon wrote: > BTW, is there any chance to include lm_sensors also in mainstream kernel ? This is something that I would really like to see. I've been using the lm_sensors patch on several kernels on at least two different types of hardware with no problems whatsoever. If there's no technical reason to keep it out, I think this would be a good candidate for integration. -- -Steven In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. -- George Orwell - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/