Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262166AbVEXXoX (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 May 2005 19:44:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262161AbVEXXoX (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 May 2005 19:44:23 -0400 Received: from gateway-1237.mvista.com ([12.44.186.158]:55538 "EHLO av.mvista.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262166AbVEXXoO (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 May 2005 19:44:14 -0400 Subject: Re: RT patch acceptance From: Daniel Walker Reply-To: dwalker@mvista.com To: Bill Huey Cc: Nick Piggin , Ingo Molnar , Christoph Hellwig , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org, sdietrich@mvista.com In-Reply-To: <20050524224157.GA17781@nietzsche.lynx.com> References: <1116890066.13086.61.camel@dhcp153.mvista.com> <20050524054722.GA6160@infradead.org> <20050524064522.GA9385@elte.hu> <4292DFC3.3060108@yahoo.com.au> <20050524081517.GA22205@elte.hu> <4292E559.3080302@yahoo.com.au> <20050524090240.GA13129@elte.hu> <4292F074.7010104@yahoo.com.au> <1116957953.31174.37.camel@dhcp153.mvista.com> <20050524224157.GA17781@nietzsche.lynx.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: MontaVista Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 16:44:04 -0700 Message-Id: <1116978244.19926.41.camel@dhcp153.mvista.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 (2.0.2-3) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1447 Lines: 34 On Tue, 2005-05-24 at 15:41 -0700, Bill Huey wrote: > On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 11:05:53AM -0700, Daniel Walker wrote: > > I think Ingo is just confident that in time things will get merged. I > > know that there are some people who don't want/like the RT changes. I'm > > interested to know what people's objections are. So far in this thread > > the only objection that I've feel is valid is the added complexity the > > RT patch would add to Linux. > > There's a process to this that has to happen before inclusion. Ingo > outlined that earlier. This patch isn't terribly well known and really > needs to be hammered much harder by a larger community to trigger > breakage. That's a good reason why it should be included. The maintainers know that as developers there is no way for us to flush out all the bugs in our code by ourselves. If the RT patch was added to -mm it would have greatly increased coverage which , as you noted, is needed . Drivers will break like mad , but no one but the community has all the hardware for the drivers. > I think there's a lot of general ignorance regarding this patch, the > usefulness of it and this thread is partially addressing them. True .. Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/