Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262210AbVEYAp3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 May 2005 20:45:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262211AbVEYAp3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 May 2005 20:45:29 -0400 Received: from gateway-1237.mvista.com ([12.44.186.158]:57593 "EHLO av.mvista.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262210AbVEYApW (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 May 2005 20:45:22 -0400 Subject: Re: RT patch acceptance From: Daniel Walker Reply-To: dwalker@mvista.com To: Bill Huey Cc: Nick Piggin , Ingo Molnar , Christoph Hellwig , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org, sdietrich@mvista.com In-Reply-To: <20050525001019.GA18048@nietzsche.lynx.com> References: <20050524054722.GA6160@infradead.org> <20050524064522.GA9385@elte.hu> <4292DFC3.3060108@yahoo.com.au> <20050524081517.GA22205@elte.hu> <4292E559.3080302@yahoo.com.au> <20050524090240.GA13129@elte.hu> <4292F074.7010104@yahoo.com.au> <1116957953.31174.37.camel@dhcp153.mvista.com> <20050524224157.GA17781@nietzsche.lynx.com> <1116978244.19926.41.camel@dhcp153.mvista.com> <20050525001019.GA18048@nietzsche.lynx.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: MontaVista Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 17:45:13 -0700 Message-Id: <1116981913.19926.58.camel@dhcp153.mvista.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 (2.0.2-3) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1350 Lines: 30 On Tue, 2005-05-24 at 17:10 -0700, Bill Huey wrote: > On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 04:44:04PM -0700, Daniel Walker wrote: > > That's a good reason why it should be included. The maintainers know > > that as developers there is no way for us to flush out all the bugs in > > our code by ourselves. If the RT patch was added to -mm it would have > > greatly increased coverage which , as you noted, is needed . Drivers > > will break like mad , but no one but the community has all the hardware > > for the drivers. > > It's too premature at this time. There was a lot of work that went > into the RT patch that I would have like for folks to have thought > it through more carefully like RCU, the RT mutex itself, etc... > All of it is very raw and most likely still is subject to rapid > change. > I think some of it is volatile still, but there are plenty of pieces that could go in now. Threaded interrupts is up for discussion, this is the reason why I started the thread. People appear to have specific objections to that feature, which are still not clear. Whole patch, no, small chunks yes. Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/