Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 27 Jul 2001 11:34:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 27 Jul 2001 11:34:10 -0400 Received: from [194.213.32.142] ([194.213.32.142]:5892 "EHLO bug.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 27 Jul 2001 11:33:56 -0400 Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 14:10:31 +0000 From: Pavel Machek To: Ian Chilton Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: OT: Journaling FS Comparison Message-ID: <20010723141028.B39@toy.ucw.cz> In-Reply-To: <20010722162150.A23381@woody.ichilton.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <20010722162150.A23381@woody.ichilton.co.uk>; from mailinglist@ichilton.co.uk on Sun, Jul 22, 2001 at 04:21:50PM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing Hi! > ext3 stands out because of it's compatibility with ext2 - this makes > it easy to 'upgrade' from ext2 to ext3 without loosing/moving data. > Also it would be much easier to move a drive into another machine > without worrying about the kernel having reiserfs etc compiled in. Plus, ext2 has *very* good fsck, tested by years. Last time I ran reiserfsck, it found some errors, but warned me *against* trying to fix them. I have SuSE7.2 system on reiserfs, and fsck complains slighlty. System seems to work well. How do I fix it up? Is reiserfsck really so dangerous as it cllaims? -- Philips Velo 1: 1"x4"x8", 300gram, 60, 12MB, 40bogomips, linux, mutt, details at http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/velo/index.html. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/