Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S266650AbRGYHlL>; Wed, 25 Jul 2001 03:41:11 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S266647AbRGYHlA>; Wed, 25 Jul 2001 03:41:00 -0400
Received: from femail29.sdc1.sfba.home.com ([24.254.60.19]:53711 "EHLO
	femail29.sdc1.sfba.home.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S266641AbRGYHk4>; Wed, 25 Jul 2001 03:40:56 -0400
From: "Kevin D. Wooten" <kwooten@home.com>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: sk_buffs in non-networking module
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 00:41:23 -0700
Message-ID: <AEEEJLJGDLODKEHHFIABAEAECBAA.kwooten@home.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700
Importance: Normal
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing

Is it taboo to use sk_buffs in non-networking code? Are there any problems I
am not aware of?

Kevin

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/