Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261388AbVEYWRb (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 May 2005 18:17:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261574AbVEYWRb (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 May 2005 18:17:31 -0400 Received: from e35.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.133]:43257 "EHLO e35.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261388AbVEYWRY (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 May 2005 18:17:24 -0400 Message-ID: <4294F948.20004@us.ibm.com> Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 15:16:40 -0700 From: Matthew Dobson User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050404) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Shaohua Li CC: Ashok Raj , ak@muc.de, akpm , zwane , rusty@rustycorp.com.au, vatsa@in.ibm.com, lkml , discuss@x86-64.org Subject: Re: [patch 0/4] CPU Hotplug support for X86_64 References: <20050524081113.409604000@csdlinux-2.jf.intel.com> <1116927099.3827.2.camel@linux-hp.sh.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <1116927099.3827.2.camel@linux-hp.sh.intel.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.2.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1921 Lines: 55 Shaohua Li wrote: > On Tue, 2005-05-24 at 01:11 -0700, Ashok Raj wrote: > >>TBD: >> >>1. Track down CONFIG_SCHED_SMT Oops with both cpu up/down. >>2. Test on real NUMA hw. >> > > With below patch, cpu hotplug works with SCHED_SMT enabled in my test. > set_cpu_sibling_map is invoked before cpu is set to online. > > Thanks, > Shaohua I'm not sure, but you probably want "for_each_cpu(i)" instead of "for (i = 0; i < NR_CPUS; i++)" below. It should be rare that you really want to explicitly itterate over [0..NR_CPUS] cpus. for_each_cpu() will itterate over all "possible" cpus, which may well be [0..NR_CPUS], but it at least is cleaner and more readable. If your arch actually sets up cpu_possible_map correctly, then it will likely be quite a bit faster and more efficient to use for_each_cpu(). Again, I haven't looked at the surrounding code, but it's very likely that for_each_cpu() will do what you want. -Matt > --- a/arch/x86_64/kernel/smpboot.c.orig 2005-05-24 16:47:57.000000000 +0800 > +++ b/arch/x86_64/kernel/smpboot.c 2005-05-24 16:48:31.000000000 +0800 > @@ -443,7 +443,7 @@ set_cpu_sibling_map(int cpu) > int i; > > if (smp_num_siblings > 1) { > - for_each_online_cpu(i) { > + for (i = 0; i < NR_CPUS; i++) { > if (cpu_core_id[cpu] == cpu_core_id[i]) { > cpu_set(i, cpu_sibling_map[cpu]); > cpu_set(cpu, cpu_sibling_map[i]); > @@ -454,7 +454,7 @@ set_cpu_sibling_map(int cpu) > } > > if (current_cpu_data.x86_num_cores > 1) { > - for_each_online_cpu(i) { > + for (i = 0; i < NR_CPUS; i++) { > if (phys_proc_id[cpu] == phys_proc_id[i]) { > cpu_set(i, cpu_core_map[cpu]); > cpu_set(cpu, cpu_core_map[i]); - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/