Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 25 Jul 2001 06:41:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 25 Jul 2001 06:40:59 -0400 Received: from sundiver.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE ([134.93.174.136]:23278 "HELO duron.intern.kubla.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 25 Jul 2001 06:40:47 -0400 Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 12:40:48 +0200 From: Dominik Kubla To: Alan Cox Cc: Paul Jakma , Dominik Kubla , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Arp problem Message-ID: <20010725124048.A9264@intern.kubla.de> In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i X-No-Archive: yes Restrict: no-external-archive Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 12:11:52AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > however, in the interests of flexibility and kindness to admins who > > have to deal with legacy setups, is or would it be possible to make > > linux be able to fully route packets between interfaces bound to the > > same device? > > Turn on ip forwarding, turn off ip redirect sending. It can all be done > via /proc. But that turns off all ip redirect sending, which may pose different problems. Kind of sledgehammer approach wouldn't you agree? If somebody were to produce a patch that allowed full routing between aliased interfaces without turning off ip redirect sending, would you accept this? Dominik -- ScioByte GmbH, Zum Schiersteiner Grund 2, 55127 Mainz (Germany) Phone: +49 6131 550 117 Fax: +49 6131 610 99 16 GnuPG: 717F16BB / A384 F5F1 F566 5716 5485 27EF 3B00 C007 717F 16BB - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/