Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261715AbVEZTfC (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 May 2005 15:35:02 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261718AbVEZTfA (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 May 2005 15:35:00 -0400 Received: from palrel13.hp.com ([156.153.255.238]:35472 "EHLO palrel13.hp.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261714AbVEZTdC (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 May 2005 15:33:02 -0400 From: David Mosberger MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17046.9315.652129.602688@napali.hpl.hp.com> Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 12:32:51 -0700 To: Andrew Morton Cc: rusty@rustcorp.com.au, Shaohua Li , pavel@ucw.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com Subject: Re: Hotplug CPU printk issue In-Reply-To: <20050525225204.68bf0684.akpm@osdl.org> References: <1113467253.2568.10.camel@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com> <1117076334.4086.11.camel@linux-hp.sh.intel.com> <20050525204828.70acc1b5.akpm@osdl.org> <1117086211.7657.10.camel@linux-hp.sh.intel.com> <20050525225204.68bf0684.akpm@osdl.org> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 21.4.1 Reply-To: davidm@hpl.hp.com X-URL: http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/David_Mosberger/ Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1439 Lines: 34 >>>>> On Wed, 25 May 2005 22:52:04 -0700, Andrew Morton said: Andrew> Shaohua Li wrote: >> > Please confirm that we in fact do not want to allow downed CPUs to >> > print things, then send a patch. >> Yep. In the cpu hotplug case, per-cpu data possibly isn't initialized >> even the system state is 'running'. As the comments say in the original >> code, some console drivers assume per-cpu resources have been allocated. >> radeon fb is one such driver, which uses kmalloc. After a CPU is down, >> the per-cpu data of slab is freed, so the system crashed when printing >> some info. Andrew> hm, that certainly sounds sane, but I do recall there were Andrew> reasonable-sounding reasons why the ia64 guys wanted Andrew> printk-on-a-down-CPU to work. Hopefully David can remember Andrew> what the problem was so we can find a more thorough fix. I don't recall having submitted such a patch. According to the bk log, it was Rusty who added the !system_running check (which was later changed to system_state != SYSTEM_RUNNING). The changelog only says: "- Allow printk on down cpus once system is running" Rusty? --david - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/