Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261931AbVE0UlO (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 May 2005 16:41:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262582AbVE0UlC (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 May 2005 16:41:02 -0400 Received: from dsl027-180-168.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.27.180.168]:11978 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262587AbVE0Ukw (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 May 2005 16:40:52 -0400 Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 13:40:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20050527.134032.78491984.davem@davemloft.net> To: mchan@broadcom.com Cc: linville@tuxdriver.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com, jgarzik@pobox.com Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.12-rc5] tg3: add bcm5752 entry to pci.ids From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <1117221859.4310.6.camel@rh4> References: <20050527184750.GB11592@tuxdriver.com> <20050527.123037.68041200.davem@davemloft.net> <1117221859.4310.6.camel@rh4> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.4 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 675 Lines: 17 From: "Michael Chan" Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 12:24:19 -0700 > So in the future, do we need to patch this file or just let sourceforge > take care of it? I think the proper procedure is to send it to sourceforge. But there is some latency in the changes making it back into the kernel. Either way, if it is submitted to the kernel or sourceforge (or even both), it ends up getting merged together in the end. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/