Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 25 Jul 2001 14:55:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 25 Jul 2001 14:54:50 -0400 Received: from minus.inr.ac.ru ([193.233.7.97]:64522 "HELO ms2.inr.ac.ru") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 25 Jul 2001 14:54:39 -0400 From: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru Message-Id: <200107251854.WAA10018@ms2.inr.ac.ru> Subject: Re: Patch suggestion for proxy arp on shaper interface To: berto@fatamorgana.com (Roberto Arcomano) Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 22:54:16 +0400 (MSK DST) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <01072520050001.01036@berto.casa.it> from "Roberto Arcomano" at Jul 25, 1 08:05:00 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing Hello! > As I said in my first message, I tested it with 2.4.6 and it "appears" (I > tested it in a very little net) to work well The patch works right, I think. But it is so utterly ugly and its scope is so narrow, that I do think this is acceptable. Actually, you may use CBQ instead it does not create problems of this kind. Seems, scripts to setup it can be found in LRP. I can send it, but I am not sure that my copy is the newest. Alexey - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/