Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262693AbVE1KqY (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 May 2005 06:46:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262691AbVE1KqY (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 May 2005 06:46:24 -0400 Received: from rev.193.226.233.9.euroweb.hu ([193.226.233.9]:46349 "EHLO dorka.pomaz.szeredi.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262686AbVE1KqS (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 May 2005 06:46:18 -0400 To: hch@infradead.org CC: akpm@osdl.org, torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org In-reply-to: <20050528102559.GA20153@infradead.org> (message from Christoph Hellwig on Sat, 28 May 2005 11:25:59 +0100) Subject: Re: FUSE inclusion? References: <20050528102559.GA20153@infradead.org> Message-Id: From: Miklos Szeredi Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 12:44:54 +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 774 Lines: 19 > > So, if anybody still got a problem with the current version (as in -mm > > or released as 2.3-rc1 on SF.net), please speak up now. > > FUSE_ALLOW_OTHER and FUSE_DEFAULT_PERMISSIONS are still there, and off by > default. Yes. The difference between last time lays in the details of the implementation, which is now well documented in Documentation/filesystems/fuse.txt, and to which everybody has agreed to. Or am I mistaken? Do you have any specific objection to the security measures layed out in there? Thanks, Miklos - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/