Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261583AbVE3JuC (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 May 2005 05:50:02 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261587AbVE3JuC (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 May 2005 05:50:02 -0400 Received: from smtp204.mail.sc5.yahoo.com ([216.136.130.127]:53634 "HELO smtp204.mail.sc5.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S261583AbVE3Jtv (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 May 2005 05:49:51 -0400 Message-ID: <429AE1B3.4050205@yahoo.com.au> Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 19:49:39 +1000 From: Nick Piggin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050324 Debian/1.7.6-1 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: kus Kusche Klaus CC: James Bruce , "Bill Huey (hui)" , Andi Kleen , Sven-Thorsten Dietrich , Ingo Molnar , dwalker@mvista.com, hch@infradead.org, akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: RT patch acceptance References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 780 Lines: 17 kus Kusche Klaus wrote: > When I was told to analyze whether linux is suitable for our > needs, any nanokernel or two-OS approaches were excluded from the > beginning: Mgmt thought that due to their nature and complexity, > such approaches are not able to offer any improvements w.r.t. what > we have now. Clearly, "one system and one source" is wanted! > You don't explain how making the Linux kernel hard-RT will be so much simpler and more supportable! Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/