Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 25 Jul 2001 20:31:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 25 Jul 2001 20:31:31 -0400 Received: from [213.82.86.194] ([213.82.86.194]:57604 "EHLO fatamorgana.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 25 Jul 2001 20:31:27 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Roberto Arcomano To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Patch suggestion for proxy arp on shaper interface Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 02:34:07 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01072602340703.01029@berto.casa.it> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing Il 20:54, mercoled? 25 luglio 2001, hai scritto: > Hello! > > > As I said in my first message, I tested it with 2.4.6 and it "appears" (I > > tested it in a very little net) to work well > > The patch works right, I think. But it is so utterly ugly and its scope > is so narrow, that I do think this is acceptable. > > Actually, you may use CBQ instead it does not create problems of this > kind. Seems, scripts to setup it can be found in LRP. I can send it, > but I am not sure that my copy is the newest. > > Alexey Please send me script you was talking about. I know that CBQ is a more recent (and I guess better) method to limit bandwidth, but I think also there are still many users of "shaper" device who would want to avoid proxy arp problems. Thank you for all Best Regards Roberto Arcomano - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/