Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261858AbVEaBWu (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 May 2005 21:22:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261856AbVEaBWt (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 May 2005 21:22:49 -0400 Received: from smtp203.mail.sc5.yahoo.com ([216.136.129.93]:44435 "HELO smtp203.mail.sc5.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S261855AbVEaBWQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 May 2005 21:22:16 -0400 Message-ID: <429BBC2D.70406@yahoo.com.au> Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 11:21:49 +1000 From: Nick Piggin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050324 Debian/1.7.6-1 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Bill Huey (hui)" CC: James Bruce , Andi Kleen , Sven-Thorsten Dietrich , Ingo Molnar , dwalker@mvista.com, hch@infradead.org, akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: RT patch acceptance References: <20050527120812.GA375@nietzsche.lynx.com> <429715DE.6030008@yahoo.com.au> <20050527233645.GA2283@nietzsche.lynx.com> <4297EB57.5090902@yahoo.com.au> <20050528054503.GA2958@nietzsche.lynx.com> <42981467.6020409@yahoo.com.au> <4299A98D.1080805@andrew.cmu.edu> <429ADEDD.4020805@yahoo.com.au> <429B1898.8040805@andrew.cmu.edu> <429B2160.7010005@yahoo.com.au> <20050530222747.GB9972@nietzsche.lynx.com> In-Reply-To: <20050530222747.GB9972@nietzsche.lynx.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1247 Lines: 30 Bill Huey (hui) wrote: > On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 12:21:20AM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote: > >>And my questions for which I got no answer were things like >>"why is a single kernel superior to a nanokernel for hard-RT?", >>"what deterministic services would a hard-RT Linux need to provide?" > > > That's an RT begineer's question. You have to at least be up to speed > in that one to have the conversation at hand and folks have discussed > this repeatedly. It's not our end that failing and clearly you not > understanding this only reenforces this point.. > Bill, you can belittle me to your heart's content. It really doesn't bother me in the slightest. Whenever you or anyone else try to complicate the Linux kernel with hard-RT stuff, I'm going to ask exactly the same questions because I don't think you know how a nanokernel solution would work, or even what kind of services a hard-RT Linux would need to provide. Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/