Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261869AbVEaLbH (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 May 2005 07:31:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261872AbVEaLbH (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 May 2005 07:31:07 -0400 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.197]:31689 "EHLO wproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261869AbVEaLbE convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 May 2005 07:31:04 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=rQ2hqR7owBBIbA/RtLYkkjAl/mnw9Ydutjf6GtomovZSjHvYFQyqq4RxIstT8hW33Pxf3WpOpQNf/Z5GYmYP30WYHDqLGJShKQ7VS97Tjk1jYD4iZzrCD7VJtwRK9pcqtaHMS0oOo1zHHNiWfFbDoCfBt6teXY/VQuoQGVOR0YY= Message-ID: <4c14a25d050531043158fbed1b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 17:01:03 +0530 From: Hari N Reply-To: Hari N To: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: RT patch acceptance Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20050531111445.GA35122@muc.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <4299A98D.1080805@andrew.cmu.edu> <429B1898.8040805@andrew.cmu.edu> <429B2160.7010005@yahoo.com.au> <20050530222747.GB9972@nietzsche.lynx.com> <429BBC2D.70406@yahoo.com.au> <20050531020957.GA10814@nietzsche.lynx.com> <429C2A64.1040204@andrew.cmu.edu> <429C2F72.7060300@yahoo.com.au> <429C4112.2010808@andrew.cmu.edu> <20050531111445.GA35122@muc.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 862 Lines: 20 On 31 May 2005 13:14:45 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > > Are you sure it is not only disk IO? In theory updatedb shouldn't > need much CPU, but it eats a lot of memory and causes stalls > in the disk (or at least that was my interpration on the stalls I saw) > If there is really a scheduling latency problem with updatedb > then that definitely needs to be fixed in the stock kernel. Yeah true...I have actually never observed updatedb taking much of my CPU cycles. It just eats up a lot of memory. When the load average on the system is high, sometimes updatedb even results in a system freeze. -- Hari - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/