Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261940AbVEaQqg (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 May 2005 12:46:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261946AbVEaQSz (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 May 2005 12:18:55 -0400 Received: from titan.genwebhost.com ([209.9.226.66]:63666 "EHLO titan.genwebhost.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261935AbVEaQJu (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 May 2005 12:09:50 -0400 Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 09:09:46 -0700 From: randy_dunlap To: Ashutosh Naik Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] fixes the warnings obtained with arm-elf-gcc 3.4 Message-Id: <20050531090946.6435242c.rdunlap@xenotime.net> In-Reply-To: <81083a45050531035260ce77b0@mail.gmail.com> References: <81083a450505310337131c3e31@mail.gmail.com> <81083a4505053103506aba48d5@mail.gmail.com> <81083a45050531035260ce77b0@mail.gmail.com> Organization: YPO4 X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - titan.genwebhost.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - vger.kernel.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - xenotime.net X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3252 Lines: 83 On Tue, 31 May 2005 16:22:40 +0530 Ashutosh Naik wrote: | Sorry for the repeating mails | | This patch fixes the warnings obtained with arm-elf-gcc 3.4. | | Files Affected - | | -fs/jffs2/read.c | -fs/jffs2/nodemgmt.c | -fs/jffs2/readinode.c | -fs/jffs2/write.c | -fs/jffs2/gc.c | -fs/jffs2/erase.c | -fs/nfs/nfs2xdr.c | -fs/nfs/nfs3xdr.c | -drivers/base/dmapool.c | -drivers/char/random.c | -drivers/serial/8250_early.c | -net/core/dev.c | -net/sunrpc/xprt.c | -net/sunrpc/svc.c | -net/sunrpv/svcsock.c | | Signed-off-by: Ashutosh Naik These patches seem to be against plain 2.6.11, is that right? Hint: They don't apply cleanly to 2.6.12-rc5. You should send patches that apply cleanly to the latest mainline kernel version, which is currently 2.6.12-rc5, or even better, patches to 2.6.12-rc5-git5 (or linux-git-current). Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] Apply anyway? [n] 1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file drivers/base/dmapool.c.rej 2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/char/random.c.rej Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] Apply anyway? [n] 1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file drivers/serial/8250_early.c.rej Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] Apply anyway? [n] 3 out of 3 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file fs/jffs2/gc.c.rej Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] Apply anyway? [n] 2 out of 2 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file fs/jffs2/nodemgmt.c.rej Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] Apply anyway? [n] 1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file fs/jffs2/read.c.rej Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] Apply anyway? [n] 1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file fs/jffs2/readinode.c.rej Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] Apply anyway? [n] 1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file fs/jffs2/write.c.rej Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] Apply anyway? [n] 2 out of 2 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file fs/nfs/nfs2xdr.c.rej Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] Apply anyway? [n] 3 out of 3 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file fs/nfs/nfs3xdr.c.rej Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] Apply anyway? [n] 2 out of 2 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file net/core/dev.c.rej Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] Apply anyway? [n] 1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file net/sunrpc/svc.c.rej Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] Apply anyway? [n] 2 out of 2 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file net/sunrpc/svcsock.c.rej Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] Apply anyway? [n] 1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file net/sunrpc/xprt.c.rej --- ~Randy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/