Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 26 Jul 2001 07:58:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 26 Jul 2001 07:57:56 -0400 Received: from router-100M.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.17]:11788 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 26 Jul 2001 07:57:46 -0400 Subject: Re: IGMP join/leave time variability To: nat.ersoz@myrio.com (Nat Ersoz) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 12:59:01 +0100 (BST) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: from "Nat Ersoz" at Jul 25, 2001 07:04:32 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL5] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing > ASAP with respect to the user mode calls. > 1. What would be the harm if I set IGMP_Initial_Report_Delay to something > very small like 5 to 10 (jiffies)? No need for net_random() I'de expect in > that case? Read the IGMP RFC documents they discuss in detail the cases where time delays and randomness are needed and important. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/