Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965059AbVIAHXz (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Sep 2005 03:23:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965065AbVIAHXz (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Sep 2005 03:23:55 -0400 Received: from e32.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.130]:20964 "EHLO e32.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965059AbVIAHXw (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Sep 2005 03:23:52 -0400 Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 12:53:03 +0530 From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri To: Thomas Schlichter Cc: john stultz , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Updated dynamic tick patches - Fix lost tick Message-ID: <20050901072303.GB9760@in.ibm.com> Reply-To: vatsa@in.ibm.com References: <200509010829.35958.thomas.schlichter@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200509010829.35958.thomas.schlichter@web.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 773 Lines: 25 On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 08:29:32AM +0200, Thomas Schlichter wrote: > I tested the attached patch during the last night and it sems to work... A quick feedback on your patch: A litmus test that I use is if "zero" lost ticks are being hit, which we should not w/o a patch like dynamic tick. I still see zero lost ticks being reported with your patch (during bootup atleast) which means all is still not well? -- Thanks and Regards, Srivatsa Vaddagiri, Linux Technology Center, IBM Software Labs, Bangalore, INDIA - 560017 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/