Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751027AbVIAJjr (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Sep 2005 05:39:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751040AbVIAJjr (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Sep 2005 05:39:47 -0400 Received: from nproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.182.207]:59217 "EHLO nproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750936AbVIAJjq convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Sep 2005 05:39:46 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=PGOSB1sscwYaaK1cL1gIPR+FrJcE0j4nYE6jVhd9kWTQJS4/QzG9DXQVqst7YNNFtc1BJDr3gEdSkR1VnzjtK2GhltsfOYiZZS7bwdFqf646yJgcKRfKxIr38bRfp/OmnVzu27yg5GRNpGvOJR9GhznGg8bp/m3mjwu4JC6r8Ko= Message-ID: <2cd57c900509010239670c07a2@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 17:39:39 +0800 From: Coywolf Qi Hunt To: Paul Jackson Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] cpusets oom_kill tweaks Cc: Andrew Morton , Mel Gorman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dinakar Guniguntala , Joel Schopp , Simon Derr , Linus Torvalds , Dave Hansen In-Reply-To: <20050901090859.18441.67380.sendpatchset@jackhammer.engr.sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <20050901090853.18441.24035.sendpatchset@jackhammer.engr.sgi.com> <20050901090859.18441.67380.sendpatchset@jackhammer.engr.sgi.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 946 Lines: 23 On 9/1/05, Paul Jackson wrote: > This patch applies a few comment and code cleanups to mm/oom_kill.c > prior to applying a few small patches to improve cpuset management of > memory placement. > > The comment changed in oom_kill.c was seriously misleading. The code > layout change in select_bad_process() makes room for adding another > condition on which a process can be spared the oom killer (see the > subsequent cpuset_nodes_overlap patch for this addition). > > Also a couple typos and spellos that bugged me, while I was here. > > This patch should have no material affect. Why bother to have just added a variable, `releasing'? -- Coywolf Qi Hunt http://sosdg.org/~coywolf/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/