Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030369AbVIAUiz (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Sep 2005 16:38:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030370AbVIAUiz (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Sep 2005 16:38:55 -0400 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.195]:60 "EHLO wproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030369AbVIAUiz convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Sep 2005 16:38:55 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=qqCqLqYqaXzyD9MPn4DF6NFxJz492OlwEHY046dY7pYBDWZ4L66rt40WRflIT1xWrbzXTWbWOH+QKRAA+pJivsnP07WT99eHw38IdQRSmwWQ+iqF43feNYehYvVvhLfZ6G111QgSZGqIWLrXtM1T8Qoh3mc0br4BkFcz0qFlWC4= Message-ID: <9e47339105090113381222c9d0@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 16:38:54 -0400 From: Jon Smirl To: jg@freedesktop.org, Discuss issues related to the xorg tree Subject: Re: State of Linux graphics Cc: Andreas Hauser , lkml In-Reply-To: <1125605907.10488.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <43171D33.9020802@tungstengraphics.com> <1125590374.9419.35.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050901163958.9589.qmail@paladin.fortunaty.net> <1125605907.10488.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1023 Lines: 27 On 9/1/05, Jim Gettys wrote: > Not at all. > > We're pursuing two courses of action right now, that are not mutually > exclusive. > > Jon Smirl's argument is that we can satisfy both needs simultaneously > with a GL only strategy, and that doing two is counter productive, > primarily on available resource grounds. > > My point is that I don't think the case has (yet) been made to put all > eggs into that one basket, and that some of the arguments presented for > that course of action don't hold together. We're not putting all of our eggs in one basket, you keep forgetting that we already have a server that supports all of the currently existing hardware. The question is where do we want to put our future eggs. -- Jon Smirl jonsmirl@gmail.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/