Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030648AbVIBCRQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Sep 2005 22:17:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030649AbVIBCRQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Sep 2005 22:17:16 -0400 Received: from mx1.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:49096 "EHLO mx1.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030648AbVIBCRP (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Sep 2005 22:17:15 -0400 From: Andi Kleen To: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] cache pollution aware __copy_from_user_ll() Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2005 04:17:10 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 Cc: Hiro Yoshioka , torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20050825.135420.640917643.hyoshiok@miraclelinux.com> <20050902.104359.26944961.hyoshiok@miraclelinux.com> <20050901190846.479229cf.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20050901190846.479229cf.akpm@osdl.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200509020417.10574.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 709 Lines: 16 On Friday 02 September 2005 04:08, Andrew Morton wrote: > I suppose I'll queue it up in -mm for a while, although I'm a bit dubious > about the whole idea... We'll gain some and we'll lose some - how do we > know it's a net gain? I suspect it'll gain more than it loses. The only case where it might not gain is immediately someone reading the data from the page cache again after the write. But I suppose that's far less frequent than writing the data. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/