Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750736AbVIBR1y (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Sep 2005 13:27:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750748AbVIBR1y (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Sep 2005 13:27:54 -0400 Received: from fmr23.intel.com ([143.183.121.15]:53679 "EHLO scsfmr003.sc.intel.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750738AbVIBR1x (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Sep 2005 13:27:53 -0400 Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2005 09:57:02 -0400 From: Benjamin LaHaise To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.13-mm1 Message-ID: <20050902135701.GA4470@linux.intel.com> References: <20050901035542.1c621af6.akpm@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050901035542.1c621af6.akpm@osdl.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 626 Lines: 14 On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 03:55:42AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > Dropped (I have it in a new AIO patch series but I took yet another look at > all the AIO stuff and felt queasy) What's the nature of the queasiness? Is it something that can be addressed by rewriting the patches, or just general worries about adding another feature? The status quo is not acceptable. -ben - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/