Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750799AbVIBSY4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Sep 2005 14:24:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750795AbVIBSY4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Sep 2005 14:24:56 -0400 Received: from palinux.external.hp.com ([192.25.206.14]:47025 "EHLO palinux.hppa") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750730AbVIBSYz (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Sep 2005 14:24:55 -0400 Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2005 12:24:53 -0600 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Brent Casavant Cc: Hidetoshi Seto , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel list Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.13] IOCHK interface for I/O error handling/detecting (for ia64) Message-ID: <20050902182453.GB28254@parisc-linux.org> References: <431694DB.90400@jp.fujitsu.com> <20050901172917.I10072@chenjesu.americas.sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050901172917.I10072@chenjesu.americas.sgi.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 631 Lines: 13 On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 05:45:54PM -0500, Brent Casavant wrote: > I am extremely concerned about the performance implications of this > implementation. These changes have several deleterious effects on I/O > performance. I agree. I think the iochk patches should be abandoned and the feature reimplemented on top of the asynchronous PCI error notification patches from Linas Vepstas. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/