Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161167AbVICGm0 (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Sep 2005 02:42:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161168AbVICGm0 (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Sep 2005 02:42:26 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:20132 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161167AbVICGmZ (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Sep 2005 02:42:25 -0400 Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2005 23:40:42 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Miklos Szeredi Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, fuse-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, torvalds@osdl.org Subject: Re: FUSE merging? Message-Id: <20050902234042.1a7dba6e.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20050902153440.309d41a5.akpm@osdl.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 907 Lines: 22 Miklos Szeredi wrote: > > > The main sticking point with FUSE remains the permission tricks around > > fuse_allow_task(). AFAIK it remains the case that nobody has come up with > > any better idea, so I'm inclined to merge the thing. > > Do you promise? I troll. What others think matters. But at this stage, objections would need to be substantial, IMO. We're rather deadlocked on the permission thing, but if we can't come up with anything better then I'm inclined to say what-the-hell. > I can do a resplit and submit to Linus, if that takes > some load off you. Nah, then I'd just have to check that everything is the same. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/