Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932084AbVIDWDH (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Sep 2005 18:03:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932091AbVIDWDG (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Sep 2005 18:03:06 -0400 Received: from inti.inf.utfsm.cl ([200.1.21.155]:1729 "EHLO inti.inf.utfsm.cl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932084AbVIDWDF (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Sep 2005 18:03:05 -0400 Message-Id: <200509041922.j84JMVmI003942@laptop11.inf.utfsm.cl> To: bas.westerbaan@gmail.com cc: Pekka Enberg , Paul Misner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: RFC: i386: kill !4KSTACKS In-Reply-To: Message from Bas Westerbaan of "Sun, 04 Sep 2005 19:12:33 +0200." <6880bed305090410127f82a59f@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: MH-E 7.4.2; nmh 1.1; XEmacs 21.4 (patch 17) Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 15:22:31 -0400 From: Horst von Brand Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1103 Lines: 22 Bas Westerbaan wrote: > > Yes you are. You're asking for 4KSTACKS config option to maintained > > and it is not something you get for free. Besides, if it is indeed > > ripped out of mainline kernel, you can always keep it a separate patch > > for ndiswrapper. > Though 4K stacks are used a lot, they probably aren't used on all > configurations yet. Other situations may arise where 8K stacks may be > preferred. It is too early to kill 8K stacks imho. At least Fedora ships 4Kstacks kernel for quite a while now. No, it is not "everywhere", but close. -- Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 654431 Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 654239 Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 797513 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/