Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932220AbVIEG3a (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Sep 2005 02:29:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932248AbVIEG33 (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Sep 2005 02:29:29 -0400 Received: from nproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.182.199]:34282 "EHLO nproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932220AbVIEG33 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Sep 2005 02:29:29 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=VNU6KrYsnw35At30ALwpkq1PUvZTyy6+TN0+9Xvdwc+5HfYb1BNtv+uaIn9Bgr7t1FsCXwn2kYxWVfNF1Id7AxjH0ZtnjFHpW42QP345vpIWibIHX90SgMrZL3TCo6GkTW+VW7UqbzRjhIQQdsm6le57cUywzlRjnNMW9TlJD0Y= Message-ID: <84144f0205090423294d7ee873@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2005 09:29:25 +0300 From: Pekka Enberg To: Willy Tarreau Subject: Re: RFC: i386: kill !4KSTACKS Cc: Sean , Alex Davis , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20050905060405.GA16784@alpha.home.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <35547.10.10.10.10.1125892279.squirrel@linux1> <20050905040311.29623.qmail@web50204.mail.yahoo.com> <50570.10.10.10.10.1125893576.squirrel@linux1> <20050905043613.GD30279@alpha.home.local> <46230.10.10.10.10.1125895623.squirrel@linux1> <20050905050108.GA16596@alpha.home.local> <59215.10.10.10.10.1125898289.squirrel@linux1> <20050905060405.GA16784@alpha.home.local> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 781 Lines: 16 On 9/5/05, Willy Tarreau wrote: > Except that someone has to maintain the patch, because with the speed the > kernel is changing, a patch against 2.6.14 will not work on 2.6.15. Indeed. It has to be maintained in tree as well and I don't see any justification for making mainline care about !4KB_STACKS just for the sake of ndiswrapper. While I appreciate that ndiswrapper is useful for some people, it should IMHO be maintained as an out-of-tree patch (stack size included). Pekka - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/