Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932475AbVIEUTs (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Sep 2005 16:19:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932477AbVIEUTs (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Sep 2005 16:19:48 -0400 Received: from quechua.inka.de ([193.197.184.2]:19434 "EHLO mail.inka.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932480AbVIEUTr (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Sep 2005 16:19:47 -0400 Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2005 22:19:42 +0200 From: Bernd Eckenfels To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] DSFS Network Forensic File System for Linux Patches Message-ID: <20050905201942.GA7580@lina.inka.de> References: <1125823531.23858.16.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1125823531.23858.16.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1036 Lines: 23 On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 09:45:31AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > Non GPL modules are required not to be derivative works (a term of law). > The EXPORT_SYMBOL information is merely advisory to help seperate > symbols. In many cases its purely historical as to whether a symbol is > marked _GPL or not. Yes, I agree, I was just not talking about licensing/legal issues, but only about the visible technical reasons and restrictions. So I dont think I am confused... thanks for follow up, Alan. Gruss Bernd -- (OO) -- Bernd_Eckenfels@M?rscher_Strasse_8.76185Karlsruhe.de -- ( .. ) ecki@{inka.de,linux.de,debian.org} http://www.eckes.org/ o--o 1024D/E383CD7E eckes@IRCNet v:+497211603874 f:+49721151516129 (O____O) When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/