Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750984AbVIFCDf (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Sep 2005 22:03:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932199AbVIFCDf (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Sep 2005 22:03:35 -0400 Received: from smtp105.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com ([68.142.229.100]:8020 "HELO smtp105.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750984AbVIFCDe (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Sep 2005 22:03:34 -0400 From: Dmitry Torokhov To: Daniel Phillips Subject: Re: GFS, what's remaining Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2005 21:03:19 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lars Marowsky-Bree , Andi Kleen , linux clustering , akpm@osdl.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org References: <20050901104620.GA22482@redhat.com> <200509051118.45792.dtor_core@ameritech.net> <200509052057.23807.phillips@istop.com> In-Reply-To: <200509052057.23807.phillips@istop.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200509052103.20519.dtor_core@ameritech.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1783 Lines: 41 On Monday 05 September 2005 19:57, Daniel Phillips wrote: > On Monday 05 September 2005 12:18, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > On Monday 05 September 2005 10:49, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > > On Monday 05 September 2005 10:14, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: > > > > On 2005-09-03T01:57:31, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > > > > The only current users of dlms are cluster filesystems. There are > > > > > zero users of the userspace dlm api. > > > > > > > > That is incorrect... > > > > > > Application users Lars, sorry if I did not make that clear. The issue is > > > whether we need to export an all-singing-all-dancing dlm api from kernel > > > to userspace today, or whether we can afford to take the necessary time > > > to get it right while application writers take their time to have a good > > > think about whether they even need it. > > > > If Linux fully supported OpenVMS DLM semantics we could start thinking > > asbout moving our application onto a Linux box because our alpha server is > > aging. > > > > That's just my user application writer $0.02. > > What stops you from trying it with the patch? That kind of feedback would be > worth way more than $0.02. > We do not have such plans at the moment and I prefer spending my free time on tinkering with kernel, not rewriting some in-house application. Besides, DLM is not the only thing that does not have a drop-in replacement in Linux. You just said you did not know if there are any potential users for the full DLM and I said there are some. -- Dmitry - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/